{"id":104464,"date":"2022-10-22T05:34:27","date_gmt":"2022-10-22T05:34:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/paul-haggis-accuser-faces-cross-examination-in-new-york-civil-trial-deadline\/"},"modified":"2022-10-22T05:34:27","modified_gmt":"2022-10-22T05:34:27","slug":"paul-haggis-accuser-faces-cross-examination-in-new-york-civil-trial-deadline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/paul-haggis-accuser-faces-cross-examination-in-new-york-civil-trial-deadline\/","title":{"rendered":"Paul Haggis Accuser Faces Cross-Examination In New York Civil Trial \u2013 Deadline"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n\tUPDATED:<\/strong> Almost five hours into a cross examination Friday that went second by second, and sometimes foot by foot, through the confines of Paul Haggis’ apartment where Haleigh Breest said she was raped by the writer-director in 2013, she became visibly upset enough that the judge, Sabrina Kraus, called a recess shortly after 4 pm \u2014 and then an early end to the day’s testimony in the sexual misconduct civil trial in Manhattan.<\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest, who walked out of the courtroom at the break, did not return. <\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest became distressed as she was being asked by a lawyer for Haggis to demonstrate how she \u201csquirmed\u201d to avoid Haggis attempting to perform oral sex on her. She stood, tentatively hopped backward with her hands at her side. Then she looked across the courtroom, briefly tilted her head back, and said something barely audible about being \u201cstartled\u201d or \u201cscared\u201d by the sight of a news photographer who had been in the courtroom all day documenting the proceedings. <\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest waved a hand in the photographer’s direction and slumped back into the witness chair, looking anguished, before rising with her arms tightly folded to watch jurors be excused for the break.<\/p>\n

\n

\tKraus conferred for several minutes with the lawyers, and brought the jurors back in 15 minutes later to thank them and send them home for the weekend. The trial resumes Monday morning.<\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest was questioned for almost three hours before lunch, and then for just under two more hours, by Priya Chaudhry, who required Breest to go through the night of January 31, 2013 at Haggis’ apartment, where she alleges the incident occurred, in granular detail: her position on the bed in his guest room when he pulled her clothing off and then forced her to perform oral sex on him; her route through the multi-room Soho apartment when she tried to buy time and make an escape by taking a shower; the temperature of the water; and her position by the bed when Haggis later stepped into the shower and guided her back to the guest room for more sex.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cHow many inches between your feet when you’re standing there?\u201d Chaudhry asked. Breest said her feet were three inches apart when Haggis, crouching down, leaned his face toward her body. \u201cI was squirming\u201d to avoid the contact, she said. That’s when Chaudhry asked her to show how. <\/p>\n

\n

\tBefore then, Breest said under cross-examination that she didn’t look for an exit beyond the private elevator that opened onto a small foyer, didn’t open a window and scream for help, didn’t grab a kitchen knife, didn’ t lock herself in a bathroom or at any point tell Haggis she wanted out.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cThere’s no discussion about you leaving, right?\u201d Chaudhry asked.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cNo,\u201d Breest said.<\/p>\n

\n

\tShe said that when Haggis demanded oral sex, she asked if he had a condom, and he produced one. \u201cIt was the best of all bad options,\u201d she said \u2014 a remark the judge ordered jurors to ignore. But she couldn’t remember where he retrieved it, or how exactly he unwrapped it, or where it landed after he peeled it off and the oral sex continued unprotected. She said she left the bedroom for the shower without her clothes because everything was happening \u201cfast.\u201d <\/p>\n

\n

\tShe also agreed there was no mention of a condom in any of the three complaints \u2014 the original one and two amendments \u2014 where she detailed her not in seeking a lawsuit. <\/p>\n

\n

\tAs with the Kevin Spacey trial, jurors saw a floor plan of the apartment where the assault allegedly occurred. Standing in front of a poster board sized blow-up, Breest used different colored markers to draw the places where she had stood, laid and walked. <\/p>\n

\n

\tOutside the courtroom, a lawyer for Breest, Ilann M. Maazel, called the cross-examination \u201cglacial,\u201d and \u201cutterly ineffective but still appalling.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest will not return to the stand right away Monday morning. Her lawyers said that one of four women they plan to call to testify about being abused by the Oscar-winning screenwriter, producer and director is flying in on Monday, the only day she has available to appear in court. <\/p>\n

\n\tPREVIOUSLY, 11:43 AM: <\/strong>Haleigh Breest, the woman accusing Oscar-winning Crash<\/em> director Paul Haggis of raping her in 2013, finished her direct testimony Friday with a last round of friendly questioning from one of her lawyers, Zoe Salzman \u2014 and then faced a more combative interrogation lasting almost three hours without a break.<\/p>\n

\n

\tA Haggis lawyer, Priya Chaudhry, confronted Breest about her sex life, drinking, prescription drug use and her actions on the night she went to Haggis’ apartment in Manhattan.<\/p>\n

\n

\tAs a six-person jury of three men and three women looked on, with three alternates also seated, Chaudhry walked Breest through her earlier testimony in the sexual assault civil trial in New York. Under a cross-examination that sometimes turned sharp, Breest, a freelance film publicist at the time, said she went willingly to the moviemaker’s apartment following a film screening after-party that she had helped to organize and run, and drank wine with him after she had been drinking at the party.<\/p>\n

\n

\tIn testimony steered by questions from Chaudhry, with Breest often straining at being limited to yes or no answers, she said she stayed in the apartment even after Haggis had kissed her without warning. \u201cHe slobbered over my face,\u201d she tested, with Chaudhry pushing back, \u201cYes or no, did he kiss you for a few seconds?\u201d \u201cYes,\u201d Breest replied.<\/p>\n

\n

\tShe said that as they drank wine in the kitchen, Haggis suddenly backed her up against a refrigerator and said, \u201cYou’re scared of me, aren’t you?\u201d He also asked her age, and when she said 26, he replied, \u201cDo n’t act like af * cking 18-year-old.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

\tShe said she really was scared \u2014 \u201cI was so scared and embarrassed\u201d \u2014 but answered \u201cno\u201d to his question, which she said on cross-examination wasn’t true. She put on a \u201cfront,\u201d she said, with a man she has previously described as a friend of her boss at the movie events company. She made no effort to collect the shoes and tote bag she had dropped in the kitchen, close to a hallway leading to a private elevator to the lobby, and she accepted a tour of the apartment that ended in the guest bedroom, where she said the rape took place. <\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cMr. Haggis did not force you into that room, did he?\u201d Chaudhry asked.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cNo,\u201d Breest said.<\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest said Haggis pushed her on to the guest bed, and during a struggle got her tights, dress and sweater off. \u201cBut during the struggle you never once kicked him, is that right?\u201d Chaudhry said.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cCorrect,\u201d Breest said.<\/p>\n

\n

\tShe said Haggis, kneeling on the bed, then took off his own clothes.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cYou’re just sitting there naked on the bed watching Mr. Haggis take his shirt off?\u201d Chaudry asked. Breest called that a \u201cmischaracterization.\u201d <\/p>\n

\n

\tThe three-hour exchange ended shortly after that, and will resume after jurors return from lunch.<\/p>\n

\n

\tThe trial got underway in a Manhattan courtroom this week with graphic testimony over three days from Breest. Describing the assault, she said, \u201cI was like a trapped animal,\u201d she told jurors Thursday. <\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest went public with her rape claim in 2017 amid a flurry of news reporting about film producer Harvey Weinstein serially sexually abusing women. Those revelations spawned a movement and a hashtag, #MeToo, encouraging victims to come forward with their experiences of sexual violence at the hands of powerful \u2014 and seemingly untouchable \u2014 men. <\/p>\n

\n

\tBreest has said that she decided to finally speak up four years after the assault when she heard Haggis condemn Weinstein. \u201cThe hypocrisy of it made her blood boil,\u201d Salzman told the court.<\/p>\n

\n

\tAs Breest testified Thursday, jurors in a federal courthouse around the corner were reaching a quick verdict in another high-profile sexual misconduct case involving a major film industry figure, and a story of a traumatic encounter in a New York apartment \u2014 but decades earlier \u2014 that also blew up in the year of #MeToo. <\/p>\n

\n

\tThat jury ruled that Anthony Rapp had failed to prove his claim that in 1986, when he was 14, a 26-year-old Kevin Spacey tried to coerce him into sex. The original #MeToo moment has reverberated through a handful of trials pitting accusers against well-known men.<\/p>\n

\n

\tSpacey, like Haggis, is facing multiple accusers. Breest’s lawyers say they plan to call as many as four other women who will claim they, too, were victims of Haggis. <\/p>\n

\n

\tHaggis has said the sex with Breest was consensual and in opening arguments his lawyers pointed to texts Breest sent a friend and co-worker that described the sex as \u201crough and aggressive\u201d but didn’t characterize it as rape. Salzman, in opening arguments, read the same text exchange, in which Breest also wrote, \u201cNever, ever again \u2026 And I kept saying no.\u201d <\/p>\n

\n

\tHaggis has also argued that Breest could be a cat’s paw for the Church of Scientology, which Haggis belonged to before quitting and publicly criticizing the organization \u2014 known for the celebrities in its ranks and for its willingness to sue critics \u2014 as a \u201ccult.\u201d <\/p>\n

\n

\tThe last leg of direct questioning from Breest’s lawyer addressed this point. <\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cAre you now or have you ever been a member of the Church of Scientology\u201d Salzman asked.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cNo,\u201d said Breest, adding that she has no family members in the organization, and has never attended any Scientology events.<\/p>\n

\n

\t\u201cHas Scientology provided you with any kind of support whatsoever in this case?\u201d Salzman asked. Breest said no, explaining that hers is a contingency fee arrangement in which each lawyers only get paid a portion of any judgement she might receive if jurors find Haggis liable and award her money. <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n