{"id":163720,"date":"2022-12-21T00:50:59","date_gmt":"2022-12-21T00:50:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/james-gunn-responds-to-people-who-have-been-unkind\/"},"modified":"2022-12-21T00:50:59","modified_gmt":"2022-12-21T00:50:59","slug":"james-gunn-responds-to-people-who-have-been-unkind","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/james-gunn-responds-to-people-who-have-been-unkind\/","title":{"rendered":"James Gunn responds to people who have been \u201cunkind\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
<\/p>\n
\n
\"James<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

James Gunn<\/figcaption>
photo: Frazer Harrison (Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/figure>\n

It seems like James Gunn might need to learn a lesson that he probably should’ve learned a few years ago, with his accessibility on social media rapidly making him a target for people who are\u2026 not especially enthusiastic about the moves he’s been making in his new position as the co-head of DC Studios<\/span> (Warner Bros. Discovery’s recently rebranded department in charge of superhero\/comic book movies). That lesson, of course, is \u201cmaybe don’t go on Twitter at all\u201d or at least \u201climit who can respond to what you post,\u201d because\u2014let’s not forget\u2014that website was a dump even before that big idiot took over . <\/p>\n

This stems from a post that Gunn made in Twitter this week in which he admitted that he and fellow DC Studios co-head Peter Safran were \u201caware\u201d that when they took the job there would be \u201ca certain minority of people online that could be , well, uproarious & unkind, to say the least.\u201d (He didn’t specifically say it, but we all know what he’s talking about, right? Maybe a group of people who rally together behind one specific demand and screamed about it for years until WB caved and gave them exactly what they wanted, but they still won’t shut up about it?)<\/p>\n