{"id":38813,"date":"2022-06-06T13:01:01","date_gmt":"2022-06-06T13:01:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/pistol-fact-checking-the-sex-pistols-miniseries\/"},"modified":"2022-06-06T13:01:01","modified_gmt":"2022-06-06T13:01:01","slug":"pistol-fact-checking-the-sex-pistols-miniseries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/pistol-fact-checking-the-sex-pistols-miniseries\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Pistol’: Fact-Checking The Sex Pistols Miniseries"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The first attempt to dramatize the Sex Pistols saga came with the release of the Julien Temple’s movie The Great Rock and Roll Swindle<\/em> in 1980, just two years after the band imploded. The farcical film tells the story from the perspective of manager Malcolm McLaren and is so cartoonish that parts of it are actually animated.<\/p>\n

It was the start of a mini-industry of Sex Pistols retrospectives that told their story from every conceivable angle, including the Gary Oldman \/ Chloe Webb movie Sid and Nancy<\/em>the Julien Temple documentary The Filth and the Fury<\/em> where he flips around The Great Rock and Roll Swindle<\/em> by letting the band tell their own tale, and memoirs by original bassist Glen Matlock, guitarist Steve Jones, and frontman John Lydon. (We’re still waiting on drummer Paul Cook to write a book and complete the set. If you want a neutral perspective, the best place to turn is Jon Savage’s 1991 book England’s Dreaming<\/em>.)<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Danny Boyle’s new six-part limited series Pistol <\/em>on FX is the latest attempt to head back to mid-Seventies London and see how the owner of a provocative clothing store unleashed a group of teenage misfits into a decrepit rock scene, and how they somehow made one of the best albums of the decade before imploding in spectacular fashion just two weeks into their first American tour.<\/p>\n

The series is based on Jones’ book Lonely Boy<\/em> and is framed around the guitarist, but Matlock, Cook, and the estate of Sid Vicious are all on board to various degrees. John Lydon, unsurprisingly, was not involved and even took his former bandmates to court in an unsuccessful effort to stop it. \u201cIt is so destructive to what the band is and so I fear that the whole project might be extremely negative,\u201d he said. “How can anyone think that this can proceed without consulting me and deal with my personal life in this, and my issues in this, without any meaningful contact with me before the project is announced to the world. I don’t think there are even words that I can put forward to explain quite how disingenuous this is. “<\/p>\n

Lydon may be enraged that he’s not controlling Pistol<\/em> and isn’t even the central figure, but he’d possibly be relieved to know that it sticks closer to the historical record than recent biopics about Queen, Elton John, and M\u00f6tley Cr\u00fce. But like all projects of this nature, it takes certain liberties with the truth, some small and some quite large. Here are eight of them.<\/p>\n