{"id":92992,"date":"2022-10-10T18:37:16","date_gmt":"2022-10-10T18:37:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/what-it-got-wrong-and-what-friend-of-the-family-got-right\/"},"modified":"2022-10-10T18:37:16","modified_gmt":"2022-10-10T18:37:16","slug":"what-it-got-wrong-and-what-friend-of-the-family-got-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/what-it-got-wrong-and-what-friend-of-the-family-got-right\/","title":{"rendered":"What it got wrong and what ‘Friend of the Family’ got right"},"content":{"rendered":"
This month a TV series premiered about a series of disturbing and heinous crimes committed by a seemingly innocuous white man, and it managed to neither exploit or disrespect his victims nor sensationalize his crime. It was a reserved, cautionary tale that sought to educate more than titillate. <\/p>\n
I’m talking, of course, about Peacock’s “A Friend of the Family.” <\/p>\n
Did you think I meant Netflix’s “Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story”? While that is also a true-crime story about a man who did truly evil things, it is not what anyone would call respectful.<\/p>\n
Comparing “Dahmer” to “Friend,” released a week later on a less prominent streaming service, provides case studies in true crime. The former is about one of the country’s most notorious serial killers, who murdered and dismembered 17 men and boys in Ohio and Wisconsin between 1978 and 1991. The latter is about a pedophile who wormed his way into the lives of an Idaho family in the 1970s , preying on their young daughter.<\/p>\n
Both are heinous acts that are difficult to contemplate, but “Dahmer” lacks the sensitivity and tact of “Friend.” “Dahmer” has angered the families of the serial killer’s victims, while “Family” was made with the cooperation of the survivor at the story’s center. <\/p>\n