{"id":95437,"date":"2022-10-13T02:51:23","date_gmt":"2022-10-13T02:51:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/the-regime-debanks-kanye-west\/"},"modified":"2022-10-13T02:51:23","modified_gmt":"2022-10-13T02:51:23","slug":"the-regime-debanks-kanye-west","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/the-regime-debanks-kanye-west\/","title":{"rendered":"The Regime Debanks Kanye West"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

This is very, very chilling:<\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/p>\n
\n

Earlier today I learned that @kanyewest<\/a> was officially kicked out of JP Morgan Chase bank. I was told there was no official reason given, but they sent this letter as well to confirm that he has until late November to find another place for the Yeezy empire to bank. pic.twitter.com\/FUskokb6fP<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) October 12, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/span>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

What Kanye West said about Jews was disgraceful and indefensible. But to de-bank him for it? I would love to see a full roster of JP Morgan Chase’s clients, to see what kind of moral monsters a million times more wicked than a mentally ill pop star with ugly opinions about Jews, or who broadcast messages a million times nastier than “White Lives Matter” (which isn’t nasty at all, but still), use their services without problems. <\/p>\n

Like Candace Owens, I don’t care what you think about Kanye West (I’m not a fan), you had better care, and care a lot, about the big bank doing this to him. This is not ultimately about Kanye West. What the bank has done is perfectly legal — but it’s a rudimentary social credit system. We’re going to start seeing a lot more of it. I warned you about this in Live Not By Lies<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\n

[C]ompanies like PayPal have used the guidance of the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center to make it impossible for certain right-of-center individuals and organizations\u2014including the mainstream religious-liberty law advocates Alliance Defending Freedom\u2014to use its services.Though the bank issued a general denial when asked, JPMorgan Chase has been credibly accused of closing the accounts of an activist it associates with the alt-right. In 2018, Citigroup and Bank of America announced plans to stop doing some business with gun manufacturers.<\/p>\n

It is not at all difficult to imagine that banks, retailers, and service providers that have access to the kind of consumer data extracted by surveillance capitalists would decide to punish individuals affiliated with political, religious, or cultural groups those firms deem to be antisocial. Silicon Valley is well known to be far to the left on social and cultural issues, a veritable mecca of the cult of social justice. Social justice warriors are known for the spiteful disdain they hold for classically liberal values \u200b\u200blike free speech, freedom of association, and religious liberty. These are the kinds of people who will be making decisions about access to digital life and to commerce. The rising generation of corporate leaders take pride in their progressive awareness and activism. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

More:<\/p>\n

\n

As of this writing, the global online payments transfer system PayPal refuses to let white supremacist groups use its services. It’s hard to object to that, though First Amendment purists will feel some distress. But PayPal also stigmatizes some mainstream conservative groups. And as we have seen, some major banks now have policies that deny service to firearms manufacturers and sellers\u2014this, even though guns are legal to make and to own under the Second Amendment. Note well that the government did not force these giant financial firms to adopt these policies. What is to stop private entities that control access to money and markets from redlining individuals, churches, and other organizations they deem to be bad social actors from denying access to commerce?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Live Not By Lies<\/em> came out in paperback yesterday. I’ve you’ve put off reading it, now’s the time. Here is a link to a free, downloadable study guide. You and\/or your group will find that helpful. The things I was predicting in 2020, when the book was first published, are now coming true. We are not going to have forever to prepare. Normal people find it so difficult to imagine this stuff happening in America. But it is! At the Lutheran pastors’ conference I was at earlier this week, I gave a LNBL talk. Afterwards, a pastor came up to me in the hallway and said that he thought maybe I was exaggerating about Central Bank Digital Currencies — it sounds paranoid, I know — but he googled information about it, and discovered that Joe Biden issued an executive order pushing them.<\/p>\n

Things people never imagined would happen in America are happening right now, every day. <\/em>In Michigan this week, I learned that Prop 3, the pro-abortion constitutional amendment on the ballot this November, carries within it something devastating. From The Federalist:<\/p>\n

\n

In less than one month, if Proposal 3 passes, children will have a right under the Michigan constitution to walk into one of Planned Parenthood’s 12 so-called \u201cgender affirming\u201d facilities in the state and, without parental knowledge or consent, obtain puberty blockers . And with Planned Parenthood of Michigan promising \u201cgender affirming\u201d care \u201cvia telehealth in the coming months,\u201d Michiganders’ kids won’t even need to leave their house to obtain these sterilizing drugs. <\/p>\n

Passage of Prop 3 will also give boys a constitutional right to be castrated and girls the right under Michigan’s constitution to be sterilized by way of a hysterectomy or the removal of their ovaries \u2014 all without their parents’ consent.<\/p>\n

Deceptive marketing by Planned Parenthood and far-left politicians, such as Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, hides this reality Michigan voters, leading Prop 3 to be uniformly referred to as \u201cthe abortion amendment\u201d even though the expansive language of the proposed constitutional amendment reaches far beyond abortion. And on abortion alone, notwithstanding proponents’ claims that \u201cpassing this amendment simply restores the same protections that Michiganders had for five decades under Roe v. wade<\/em>,\u201d Prop 3 goes far beyond the controlling Roe-Casey <\/em>precedent: If passed, the constitutional amendment would create an extreme regime in Michigan of abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason, without informed or parental consent, and paid for by taxpayers. <\/p>\n

The expansive and legalistically worded language of Prop 3, crafted by Planned Parenthood and left-wing backers, however, extends beyond abortion to create a constitutional right to several aspects of what transgender activists call \u201cgender-affirming care,\u201d despite it being neither affirming nor caring. And Prop 3 extends that right to all individuals, including children. <\/p>\n

This is not merely a political point, and it is not a worst-case-scenario argument based on how some liberal activist judge or justice might interpret Prop 3. This reality flows from the plain language of Prop 3 and rests on general legal principles of constitutional construction.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Take a look at this compelling video the Lutherans of Michigan have made to educate voters about what Prop 3 means:<\/p>\n

\n

\n<\/p>\n