{"id":98719,"date":"2022-10-16T11:40:45","date_gmt":"2022-10-16T11:40:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/star-trek-writers-on-unmade-chris-pine-sequel\/"},"modified":"2022-10-16T11:40:45","modified_gmt":"2022-10-16T11:40:45","slug":"star-trek-writers-on-unmade-chris-pine-sequel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harchi90.com\/star-trek-writers-on-unmade-chris-pine-sequel\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Star Trek’ Writers on Unmade Chris Pine Sequel"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patrick McKay and John D. Payne’s attempt at a fourth movie in the rebooted series would have been “‘Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade’ in space.”<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n

Despite the box office success of JJ Abrams’ \u201cStar Trek\u201d movies, the iconic sci-fi franchise has been exclusively focused on television for the past half-decade. Paramount initially planned more sequels to the Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto-led franchise after 2016’s \u201cStar Trek Beyond,\u201d with everyone from Quentin Tarantino to Noah Hawley taking stabs at script ideas. But none of them ever materialized, and for the moment it appears that Trekkies will have to be content with the cornucopia of series currently streaming on Paramount+.<\/p>\n

But, in the spirit of Marvel-induced multiverse madness, that doesn’t mean it isn’t fun to ask\u2026 \u201cWhat if?\u201d In a new interview with Esquire, Patrick McKay and John D. Payne, who worked on \u201cStar Trek Beyond\u201d before creating \u201cThe Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power,\u201d opened up about a sequel they wrote that never made it to production.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe worked on a couple of ‘Star Trek’ movies. The one you’re asking about would have been the fourth in the franchise, reuniting Chris Hemsworth and Chris Pine,\u201d McKay said. \u201cThe conceit was that through a cosmic quirk in the ‘Star Trek’ world, they were the same age. It was going to be a grand father-son space adventure \u2014 think ‘Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade’ in space. We were really thrilled about it.\u201d<\/p>\n